With the recent explosion of information about HHS endangering migrant children by not properly vetting the homes that the children were being sent to, I had a horrifying thought: Did California legislators specifically pass AB-1518 and SB-1414 to ensure that the State of California could profit off child sex trafficking?
I. Scott Wiener
Back in 2024, I wrote an article titled “Why Do I Think Scott Wiener is Evil?” where I made a list of specific pieces of legislation that were tied to Mr. Wiener which I believe led to an increase in crime and/or physical harm to constituents, particularly children.
In my opinion, the most concerning issue addressed in that article was the gutting of SB-1414, the bill to make child sex trafficking a felony. Thanks to changes made by the public safety committee (which Mr. Wiener was on), in its final version, the bill only protects some children in some circumstances:
1. Sex trafficking a child who is 16 or 17 year olds was decriminalized, so traffickers and “Johns” can still sell/buy 16 and 17 year olds without fear of felony prosecution.
2. Buying a child who is 15 and under is only a felony if the “John” is a repeat offender, so there are still no protections in place for a child who is with a “John” who has never been caught before. Even if convicted of the felony, they only get jail time, not prison time.
3. There are no punishments for a child selling/purchasing another child. So a 17-year old can traffic/buy an unlimited number of infants with no penalties whatsoever.
II. Dr. Akilah Weber-Pierson
In March of this year, it came to my attention that San Diego Senator Dr. Weber-Pierson was encouraging vulnerable people to give their private information to a San Diego NGO called Dreams for Change (DFC). DFC has had multiple clients allege that they have been sexually assaulted by the staff. The clients also alleged that DFC routinely hired newly released prisoners. DFC was specifically looking for illegal aliens with children, particularly children under six.
I wrote an article titled “Is State Senator Dr. Akilah Weber Pierson Involved in Human Trafficking?” where I pointed out some legislative bills that she’d voted for that helped facilitate human trafficking.
I’d noted that she’d voted for AB-495, which makes it easy for children to be kidnapped from schools via an affidavit. DFC and other NGOs are paid by the State of California to help vulnerable people. The vulnerable people give these NGOs their private information, so the NGOs have all the information needed to create a false affidavit and kidnap the children.
She also voted for AB-1518, in which the State of California agreed to turn a blind eye to illegal aliens being employed by California companies as long as the employers collects the millionaire income tax rate for the state from the illegals. No proof that labor laws were being followed was required. Not only was the state explicitly allowing the exploitation of illegal aliens, the state itself was profiting off of said exploitation. While AB-1518 only passed at the end of 2025, all it did was make an existing temporary law, AB-2660, permanent. No changes were made to the law itself. AB-2660 was passed in 2020 and went into effect in 2021, so the State of California has been exploiting illegal aliens for the last five years.
The timing of these bills is important. When AB-2660 passed, there were abundant amounts of unaccompanied migrant children available to traffickers because Xavier Becerra was giving children to anyone who wanted them, literally no questions asked. AB-495 passed not long after President Trump closed the border and the supply of children was cut off, making AB-495 appear to be a desperate attempt to replenish the supply to traffickers. Meanwhile, at the same time that AB-495 passed, the State of California was facing a fiscal crises…
III. Catherine Blakespear
A couple of weeks ago, I attended a human trafficking seminar hosted by Catherine Blakespear. They closed the seminar without taking questions from the audience, so as the speakers were getting up to leave the stage, I screamed “Ms. Blakespear, why did you vote for AB-1518?” She didn’t answer. I loudly explained to the room that AB-1518 was literally the State of California running its own labor trafficking ring. One of her staff approached me and asked me to send a follow up email with my concerns. I sent two emails.
One addressed labor trafficking and the other addressed how she had voted for a series of bills which helped facilitate child sex trafficking.
IV. Connecting the Dots
Why wouldn’t sex traffickers utilize AB-1518? Sex trafficking has all kinds of cover operations, such as massage parlors and escort services, where pimps can present themselves as legitimate businesses. Why wouldn’t a sex trafficker pay the State of California the extra income taxes in order to ensure the state didn’t do any investigating into their operation?
And with SB-1414, why wouldn’t the sex traffickers utilize children as a part of their operations? After all, there are zero consequences for trafficking a 16 or 17 year old. If they vetted their Johns to ensure none had prior arrests, there would be zero consequences for trafficking younger children.
Prior to SB-1414, child sex trafficking wasn’t recognized by the State of California as a felony, and what was then AB-2660 ensured that the state could get a cut of the revenue generated by child sex trafficking. It appears to me that the intention of SB-1414 in its final form was to ensure the state could continue to profit off of child sex trafficking. After all, the State was facing a fiscal crises, and this was a way to generate more revenue.
If my presumption that the legislators intentionally decriminalized child sex trafficking via these two bills is incorrect, then this week they will submit emergency bills to alter both bills so that they better protect potential victims. However, I am betting that the legislators ignore these concerns and allow the child sex trafficking to continue unabated.
Legislators, what are you going to do?
Note: I am not suicidal, I don’t have depression issues, I am a careful driver, I rarely drink alcohol, and I do not use drugs of any kind (not even aspirin). My family lives a wholesome life. If something happens to me or my family that is out of character for us, we were set up by the State of California as revenge for exposing their crimes.