Violations of Laws/Rights – Page 6

October 7, 2021December 28, 2022

FTB Is Retaliatory Harassing Me

On Sunday, August 29, 2021, I attempted to file a police report with the San Diego Police Department against two FTB staff for overcharging me interest, which is the crime of fraud. Here is the proof of fraud by Alexis Bear and by Carrey Burton-Beilby. FYI, a police report is an important first step in getting a grand jury investigation launched. As a side note, I later found out that the right venue is the FBI’s website, and I did file reports against Bear and Burton-Beilby with the FBI.

On Monday, August 30, 2021, Deputy Attorney-General Anna Barsgeyan, who is FTB’s attorney for the civil case that is pending in San Diego Superior Court, made a reservation for a Motions for Sanctions hearing in our civil case. On Wednesday, September 1, 2021, she filed her Motion, requesting that the judge stop me from gathering evidence for my federal criminal complaint and that he penalize me $8,000 as a punishment for gathering the evidence that I did. She also posted my and my husband’s full social security numbers on a public website.

October 3, 2021February 10, 2024

The Playbook That Government Agencies Use To Get Away With Criminal Schemes

I watched a video about a woman in Arizona (AZ) who had her children stolen by Child Protective Services (CPS).

As I watched the video, my jaw dropped as I realized that CPS in AZ used strikingly similar tactics to violate the laws as the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) in California (CA) used against me. It can’t be a coincidence that my experience was so similar to hers when it was a completely different issue, involving a completely different agency, with completely different circumstances.

I am starting to realize that there must be a playbook of tactics that government agencies use to extract extra revenue for themselves. Obviously, the specific tactics are customized by the agencies, but the general playbook appears to be identical: 1. Lay a trap, 2. Deny due process 3. Rig the justice system and 4. Have other government agencies cover it up.

June 2, 2021December 22, 2022

Attorney General Lied to the Judge in Our Hearing!

The blog has been quiet lately because I’ve been so busy with the case that I haven’t had time to update the blog. On Monday, May 24, 2021, I filed another Motion to Compel Further Information, this time on Specially Prepared Interrogatories #001: Clarification of FTB’s Policies and Procedures. The Motion + exhibits was 495 pages. It’ll take me a long time to redact and upload them all, but I will get it uploaded eventually.

On May 28, 2021, there was a hearing on my first Motion to Compel Further Information for Additional Documents. In FTB’s Opposition to Motion that they filed with the court, Deputy Attorney General Anna Barsegyan made numerous deceptive and several outright false statements to the judge!

May 12, 2021December 22, 2022

Fraudulent Statement By FTB Regarding Demand Penalties

So much stuff has come out recently in my court case. A longer post will come next month, but I wanted to share something that I know is a fraud that is systemically perpetuated by FTB. Below is a copy/paste of an exchange of information with FTB that I submitted as part of my court case (the full document is here). I hope other people currently facing bogus Demand Penalties can use it to help them in their own fight against FTB’s corruption. Here is the list of laws that are referenced below.

SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO 6A: The attached page 9 is a page from FTB’s standard operations manuals entitled Demand Penalty. It states “a penalty will not be imposed if any of the following are met:… We do not assess the penalty when the return has a zero total tax liability.” Could you please clarify whether this means the penalty won’t be imposed if there was never any tax owed for the tax year or whether this means that the penalty won’t be imposed if there is no outstanding balance on that year’s tax liability.

FTB RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 6A: Under Revenue and Taxation Code section 19133, a demand penalty is imposed if a taxpayer fails to timely respond to demand notices in the manner required. Demand penalties are imposed as required by law before consideration of any payments or credits. The demand penalty is computed at 25- percent of the total tax liability before any prepayments or credits are applied to reduce the tax liability. Thus, any payments and/or credits made by Plaintiff are irrelevant in the determination of the imposition of demand penalties under California law.

ARGUMENT FOR COMPLELLING RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY 6A: FTB has misrepresented what the law says by making two deceptive statements and one false statement in the section above. In the first sentence, Mr. Swank omitted pertinent portions of Revenue and Tax Code 19133. In the second and third sentences, he conflated two separate issues as if they were one and the same. The fourth sentence is false, and only appears to be true as a result of the deceptive and misleading statements that preceded it.

February 10, 2021August 25, 2024

FTB’s 8 Schemes To Overcharge Taxpayers

For those that prefer video, here is a 12-minute speech that I made to State Controller Betty Yee via webinar in December 2020, which sums up the info below. We’re also working on a documentary series exposing the corruption.

The over-simplified explanation of the schemes that I got ensnared in is that the Franchise Tax Board does not apply the money that you send them to your account right away. Then they charge you penalties for “paying late.” Then they over-charge interest on these penalties.

But you have to understand that the reason that they’ve been getting away with their criminal activities is because tax law is complicated, and they work the complex nature of the laws to deceive the public on what the laws actually say.

February 10, 2021December 22, 2022

My Rebuttal to FTB’s Response to My 2020 Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Request

Here is FTB’s Response to my 2020 Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Requests. Here is the rebuttal that I wrote in which I detail the following:

The Interim Taxpayer Rights Advocate, Chris Smith, committed multiple counts of collusion to cover up criminal activity by misrepresenting what the law says about FTB’s practices of withholding estimated tax payments from the taxpayer’s account .

February 9, 2021December 26, 2022

Motion to Compel Further Response to Demand for Documents filed 12-15-2020

On December 15, 2020, I filed a Motion to Compel Further Response to Demand for Documents filed 12-15-2020 with San Diego Superior Court regarding the case that I have pending against FTB for a refund of penalties, fees and interest for tax years 2011, 2013 and 2014. Here are pages 1 – 21 and pages 22 – 42.

Key Points Contained in Motion:

There are 5 line items on FTB accounting ledgers that I believe are fraudulent: 2 payments that show up as refunded even though they were not refunded, and 3 bills that I believe never existed (see pages 9, 11, 12, 21, 25).

October 5, 2020December 23, 2022

California Supreme Court Declined to Take The Accusation

No explanation was given for why the judges refused to take the Accusation where I documented that FTB employee Eric Yadao conspired to cover up his employer’s criminal activities by improperly redacting documents to hide evidence. I am disappointed, but not surprised. It seems to me that if my case was weak, the CA Supreme Court would have taken it in order to clear FTB of all allegations of criminal activity. I believe the fact that the judges chose to pass on my case indicates that I would have won.

In good news, though, I got a letter from the California Auditor’s Office indicating that they have opened an investigation into the Franchise Tax Board. No word back from the FBI as of yet.

September 4, 2020December 22, 2022

CA Supreme Court Accusation Filed Against Franchise Tax Board Employee for Covering Up That FTB is Overcharging Taxpayers

I have caught California’s income tax agency, the Franchise Tax Board (FTB), running multiple schemes where they embezzle taxpayer’s money, then impose penalties which would not had been imposed had the money not been embezzled. The false imposition of fees is the crime of racketeering. I’ve also caught them overcharging interest.

I have filed an Accusation in the California Supreme Court in which I detail how the schemes work, show the relevant legal codes that proves they are illegal, and then detail how FTB falsely makes these unlawful practices appear to be legitimate. I also call out the administrative court judges at the Office of Tax Appeals, as well as the California Bar Association, for their roles in covering up the criminal activities.

August 26, 2020December 22, 2022

CA Supreme Court Accusation Filed Against Franchise Tax Board Employee for Covering Up FTB’S Criminal Activities: Embezzling Estimated Tax Payments, Racketeering Taxpayers & Overcharging Interest

I have filed an Accusation with the California Supreme Court against Eric Yadao, who is employed by the Franchise Tax Board as an attorney (part 1, part 2).

An Accusation is basically a request to revoke Mr. Yadao’s license to practice law because of unethical and/or unlawful behavior.

In this Accusation, I clearly detail that FTB is running multiple embezzlement and racketeering schemes, and that they are also overcharging interest. On pages 5 – 20, I detailed how the schemes work. On pages 4 – 16, I listed the legal codes that these schemes violate and why. On pages 23 – 38, I showed exactly how Mr. Yadao covered up FTB’s unlawful activities via improper redactions, improper omissions, false arguments and false statements..