Administrative Channels – Page 6

August 8, 2023January 22, 2024

Third ORIM Complaint Filed Against FTB Board of Directors and Executives for Refusing to Disclose Policy and Procedure Surrounding Payments Credited for the Purpose of Calculating Interest

Quick background: Every government employee is required to take an Oath and to have an insurance policy or bond. ORIM is the insurance agency for State of California employees. For those of you who are looking to file your own claims, here is info on how to do so. Before you order an oath, check to see if I already have it posted. If you would like some models to follow, here is the first claim I filed, and here is the second claim.

I am very excited about this third claim! I have Accused fourteen individuals from four different agencies of violating my rights under California Right R&TC Section 21006(b)(2), for violating 18 USC §1001 (a)(1) by refusing to disclose FTB’s policies and procedures regarding how it is determined which payments/portions of payments are applied for the purpose of calculating interest, and for violating 18 US Code 242 by not allowing me full and free access of information in accordance with my rights, which is a Class A misdemeanor.

July 30, 2023September 11, 2024

How to Order Oaths and Report Oath Violations — Oath Violations May Have HUGE Impacts!

The explosive information is in the last paragraph. I am also working on uploading all of the Oaths that I have collected. A more recent post gives more info on the how it appears the California State government may be illegitimate due to the lack of bonds/insurance.

September 2024 update: you can apparently also email Complaints to the military at saf.ighotline@us.af.mil

Requesting Oaths

Lately, I have been trying to combat government corruption by filing insurance claims against State Employees. But I haven’t given up on filing Federal Criminal Complaint (FCC); I’ve just put FCCs on the back burner for now.

David Myrland was right: The tax man does own the court system. California law says that on tax matters, jury trials are forbidden. Now I understand why that statute was enacted. “The system” can’t control a jury like they do judges. I am so tired of the games built into “the system” to ensure that the government is never held accountable for their crimes against constituents.

I’ve decided that the next FCC that I (eventually) file will be against all the other agencies who are protecting FTB’s schemes: FTB’s Board of Directors, who knowingly allow these schemes to continue; the three Office of Tax Appeals judges and Superior Court judge who covered up FTB’s unlawful activities in my court cases against FTB; and the people at the Bar Association who won’t prosecute the lawyers who committed crimes to protect FTB.

In preparation for the FCC filing, I needed to order the Oaths for everyone who will be charged in the FCC so that I can add Treason of Oath to the list of crimes. Here is a sample letter, which in which I requested both oaths and bonds.)

Per federal law, every elected or appointed government official must sign an Oath of Office. Per California law, all other government employees are required to take an Oath of Allegiance prior to beginning employment. The law also states that the State must issue an insurance policy or bond on every government employee. Under the California Public Records Request Act (CPRA), which is Gov. Code 7920.54(a), the agencies have to turn over copies of these documents upon request. CPRA is California’s version of FOIA.

July 7, 2023July 16, 2024

FTB’s Response to My 2022 Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Requests

As is required under Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC) 21006(a)(2), every year, the Franchise Tax Board allows the general public to make requests for changes to laws, policies and/or procedures that pertain to FTB.

I participated in the December 2022 meeting by submitting a set of requests in writing on November 29, 2022 and an oral request of the same items at the meeting held on December 8, 2022. Here is the video of my speech from my perspective:

The full FTB Board meeting is here. My speech is from 14:25 – 19:46.

On January 31, 2023, FTB provided a written response to my request. For Item #4, they stated “FTB will provide you with a supplemental response by February 28, 2023, or sooner.”

On February 2, 2023, I sent my own response to FTB’s written response. In it, I stated:

July 1, 2023August 29, 2024

Update on the California Bar Association Complaint Against Deputy Attorney General Anna Barsegyan

Quick summary of what has happened with the Bar so far regarding Anna Barsegyan:

On November 18, 2021, I filed a Bar Complaint against Anna Barsegyan for harassment and retaliation. The Bar refused to open an investigation into the Complaint on the basis that, since there was a judge on the case, the Bar was absolved of its responsibilities to provide oversight of Ms. Barsegyan.

In December 2022, I filed another Bar Complaint against Anna Barsegyan. There were a slew of new charges, including conspiring to commit suborning perjury (in layman’s terms this means setting someone up as a patsy) and advising her client to break federal and state laws in order to hide evidence of criminal activity from the court. This time, the Bar sent a letter stating “Your recent correspondence presents no new evidence which would merit reopening your complaint.”

I had a back and forth email conversation with Bar employee Roy Kim, in which I stated “… I filed the new complaint, which contained many new allegations against Ms. Barsegyan that had not been included in the original complaint #21-O-14331.

…I found this denial letter to be disturbingly vague. It appears to me that you are trying to sweep these new — and very serious — allegations under the rug by pretending that I never made them.

I request that the Complaint submitted on December 19, 2022 to be treated as new Complaint, that a new file is opened for this new Complaint, that a proper investigation be done regarding ALL charges presented in the new Complaint…”

The Bar responded by agreeing to open a new Complaint.

June 24, 2023July 1, 2023

Updates on the Insurance (Bond) Claims That I’ve Filed Against CA DOJ and FTB

My first Insurance (Bond) Claim against FTB employee Grace LeBleu and CA DOJ employee Anna Barsegyan was denied on the grounds that the conspiracy to expose my and my husband’s social security numbers happened more than a year ago.

On April 20, 2023, I filed a revised claim against Michelle M. Mitchell (claim and evidence below). She is the Coordinating Supervisor in the California Department of Justice’s Public Records Department, who violated California Government Code Section 1460 by refusing to furnish Barsegyan’s bond/insurance information. She also committed fraud by telling me that the laws requiring all California employees to be bonded or insured did not exist. I believe that this outright fraud was intended to stop me from exercising my right to file a claim against Barsegyan/LeBleu, which takes my claim against her beyond a civil matter to a criminal matter: the DOJ has violated 18 US Criminal Code section §1001 and 18 USC §241.

June 19, 2023September 4, 2024

How to Order an Oath of Office for California Judges and State Level Elected Officials

Note: Here are directions to order Oaths from other California State agencies.

For those of you who want to get an Oath of Office for a judge serving in California, you must request it via snail mail: California Secretary of State, Notary Public Section, PO Box 942877, Sacramento, CA 94277-0001. Attention: Toni Baxter. Enclose a check or money order for $1.00 made out to the Secretary of State.

The turn time is approximately two weeks. If you have any questions, you can call (916) 653 -3593. Since it is always a long hold time, you will want to request a call back. The caller ID when they call you back says: “(844) 488-8051 “Sutter Cmnty Cn” I didn’t answer the first time because I thought it was spam.

Here is the letter that I sent:

December 25, 2022August 18, 2023

I Have Filed a Bond/Insurance Claim Against Anna Barsegyan and Grace LeBleu

I found out about a group called Bonds For The Win that is having success fighting government corruption in school districts. A child was harmed by the mask mandate. The mom found out that all government employees are required by federal law to be bonded. If that employee/department does something harmful, the person harmed can file a claim against their bond(s). Usually, if a claim is paid, the bond company will revoke the bond and the employee(s) will be forced to resign. Using the bond claim strategy, this mom was able to get the mask mandate removed from her district. Many other parents followed suit and tried it with their own school boards, and many have also been successful.

Since my husband and I were harmed by two government employees, I decided to give filing a bond claim a try, too.

December 23, 2022

Bar Complaint Filed Against Deputy Attorney General Anna Barsegyan

On December 19, 2022, I filed a Bar Complaint against against Deputy Attorney General Anna Barsegyan where I requested that she be disbarred. Here is a quick summary of the most egregious of the allegations in the Bar Complaint. The evidence that I included to substantiate the allegations was the second Federal Criminal Complaint that I filed against her, all the evidence for the FCC, and the DOJ email chain.

I believe that Anna Barsegyan crossed the line from representing her client into actively participating in her client’s criminal cover-up. To accomplish this cover up, she used an assortment of unlawful tactics, including Harassment, Retaliation, Violation of Rights, Abuse of the Court System, and Obstruction of Justice. In doing so, she repeatedly violated the American Bar Association rules 8.4 (a), (c) and (g).

December 6, 2022December 17, 2023

Eleven (11) Requests for FTB’s 2022 Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Meeting

Every year, the Franchise Tax Board hosts the Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Meeting, where constituents can make suggestions on how to change tax law and/or FTB policy and procedure to improve the system. FTB asks that you send them a written Request in advance, but it is not required; verbal Requests are accepted. Whether or not people can make a written request without speaking at the meeting is questionable. FTB let me do so in 2017, but others have told me FTB says that is not allowed.

Below is the written submission that I sent to FTB for the 2022 meeting. I participated in the meeting remotely; here is the video that I made of myself giving the speech.

Here is the text of the speech, which is shorter than written submission. The video of the full meeting is here, and I spoke from 14:35 – 19:45.

November 29, 2022

Franchise Tax Board Taxpayer Advocate Office

Email: FTBAdvocate@ftb.ca.gov.

CC: FTB Board Members and Executives

Re: Eleven (11) Requests for Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Meeting

Hello Taxpayer Advocate Staff:

Here are my eleven (11) requests for the 2022 Annual Taxpayer Bill of Rights Meeting. I’ve included the Board Members on this email, as well. Since I know most of you are too busy to read long letters, I have highlighted the key sentence of each item.

December 6, 2022December 20, 2024

Legislative Change Request #3 for 2023 — Repeal R&TC 19179(c)(2)

The legislative year starts at the beginning of September. From September to December, each legislator decides what they want to introduce for the next year. Below is a Legislative Request that I sent for the 2023 session.

November 29, 2022

Dear Governor Newsom Staff, GovOps Staff, Senate Governance and Finance Committee Members and Staff, Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation Members and Staff, and FTB Legislative Staff:

I request that you repeal Revenue and Tax Code 19179(c)(2) as this law is a violation of the California and US Constitutions. This law allows the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to penalize a taxpayer $5,000 for exercising their right to Protest. This law directly violates R&TC Sections 21010 and 20102, which guarantees the Right to Protest as a part of the California Taxpayer Bill of Rights. It is unconscionable that a law that allows the taxation agency to punish someone for exercising their rights was enacted in the first place.

This issue goes beyond civil rights. The Franchise Tax Board sends notices threatening that the Taxpayer will be assessed a penalty of $5,000 if the Taxpayer does not withdraw his Protest or alter his return as preferred by the bureau. These coercive threats of penalty violate multiple federal criminal codes, including 18 USC §1512, Tampering with a witness; 18 USC §872 and §1951(b), Extortion; 18 USC §876 and §1341, Mailing threatening communications.